Court of Protection Decides on Statutory Wills

In the recent case of Re D the Court of Protection considered what principles should be applied in determining whether it could order the execution of a statutory will for and on behalf of a person who had lacked testamentary capacity.

The main point that arises out of the decision is that the Court of Protection can authorise a statutory will (a will written by the Court) on the grounds that the validity of an earlier will is in dispute. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 works on the overriding principle that any decision taken on behalf of a mentally incapacitated adult must be taken in his or her best interests. Previous cases have decided that a person’s ‘best interests’ include being remembered for having done the ‘right thing’ in his or her will.

In Re D his Honour Judge Hodge QC was of the view the ‘right thing’, in this particular case, meant ensuring Mrs D’s memory was not "tainted by the bitterness of a contested probate dispute between her children". Academics are appreciating the decision as it has been acknowledged that contested probate disputes can cause stress and damage to familial relationships.

However this approach will not be appropriate in all cases. In this case the Court had overturned two wills which, on the face of them, appeared to have been validly executed (although there were grounds for questioning their validity that were not fully explored). The decision to authorise a statutory will was aided by the fact Mrs D’s children, her deputy and the Official Solicitor all agreed on the terms of the statutory will.

It is therefore unclear at the moment as to whether the court would have come to the same conclusion in a case where the parties disagree over the terms of the statutory will. In all likelihood a full investigation into the facts of each case will be conducted before the Court decides to substitute its own interpretation of the ‘right thing to do’ for an individual’s testamentary wishes, even with the existence of suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of a will.

 

Robin Gambles

Published on 06/10/2010

Hewetts News

04/05/2012: Longer Trading Hours for the Olympics

Changes that will allow large stores to open for longer on Sundays this summer bring profit opportunities, but also potential employment difficulties. Read +

23/04/2012: Creditors to be Paid from Bankrupt’s Pension

A recent High Court decision states that the trustee in bankruptcy can force activation of a pension to pay creditors. Read +

20/04/2012: Same Principles For Break-Up of Civil Partnership and Marriage

The Court of Appeal has ruled for the first time on the division of assets after the break-up of a civil partnership and emphasised that the same principles apply as they do in a marriage. Read +

10/04/2012: Victimisation of Whistleblowers

A recent ruling states that employers are not vicariously liable for workplace victimisation of whistleblowers. Read +

26/03/2012: Discrimination Against Employee Because of Her Marriage

In Dunn v Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management the EAT looks at discrimination because of marital status. Read +

More News...


Hewetts Solicitors · 55/57 London Street · Reading RG1 4PS · Tel: (0118) 957 5337 · Fax: (0118) 939 3073 · enquiries@hewetts.co.uk